Skip to main content

Cardiology: Irresistible Prize

Decision: Should you play Irresistible Prize?


Gitz should consider Irresistible Prize highly, as they benefit in multiple ways from its inclusion.  Cursebreakers probably have the next strongest reason to select it, though any defensive deck can benefit from the "snaring" property of Prize.  Dwarves, especially those that include Supremacy or the like in their deck, should also probably pack this ploy.  Finally, all hold-objective decks should be thinking about including Prize, as it works directly toward their goals.

Factor: Objective Tokens

The most obvious use for Irresistible Prize is to move your models on to objective tokens.  This is of great use to hold-objective type decks, as it can be used both to set up scoring positions when you are short on movement (attn: Sepulchral Guard) and to put your models back on objectives that they have been pushed off of.  This tactic can also be useful for  non-objective focused Dwarf decks, as you can use Prize to inspire your fighters.

However, all of the above goals can also be accomplished with Sidestep.  For us to consider Irresistible Prize useful, it really does need to do something more. 

Factor: Objective Snaring

When trying to find other uses for Irresistible Prize, it's important to note that it affects both friendly and enemy models.  Since losing Great Concussion to the Banned and Restricted List, both hold-objective and passive/defensive decks are in search of cards that can create space between multiple models at once. While hold-objective decks will likely use Prize more for placing your own models onto objective tokens, passive/defensive decks can use Prize to delay the enemy advance. Though Prize is not able to completely duplicate Great Concussion's ability to disperse models, it can be used in a similar manner if we plan ahead.

The key here is to set up your board and objective tokens in such a way as to be able to affect multiple enemy models at once.  Obviously, you aren't always able to dictate board setups; however, if you do find yourself placing the first board, you'll also be able to place the first objective.  In either scenario, it may be worth it to place the objective token on the opponent's board, on the far side of the starting hexes you think your opponent will most likely deploy to.  Then, set up your other objectives in between your models and the enemy.

The example above shows how this might work - it represents your opponent's board.  Three nasty, dirty orcses are set up to rush onto your board.  You have placed your objective token onto your opponent's board during setup where the shiny little sun is.  Now, you can use Irresistible Prize to snare all three orcs backward before they get a chance to charge in.  While this may seem minor on the surface, good defensive players know that a single hex of delay can mean a whole turn where the opponent can't interact with your models.  With a little preparation and some educated guesswork, Irresistible Prize can provide that hex of distance against multiple bad guys.  Should you find yourself up against a defensive warband, you can also reverse this process to pull multiple models forward at once.

Factor: Quad Kiting

Back in the days of yore, there existed a awful video game called Everquest (which you can experience in all its original terribleness here).  One of the only ways to make the game palatable was to use specific techniques to power up your characters faster than you would be able to otherwise.  For Wizards and Druids, that technique was "quad kiting" - using snares to force enemies into tight groups and then blasting them all down at once with spells.  For a couple of warbands, Irresistible Prize can allow you to do something similar.

Both Gitz and Cursebreakers have access to long range Area of Effect damage through Curse of da Bad Moon and Cry of Thunder, respectively.  If you don't mind putting your caster in the thick of things, Rending Scream, Chain Lightning, and Rend the Earth can deal damage to large numbers of grouped enemies as well.  Finally, since Prize can pull models onto objectives, it can also enable Sphere of Azyr and Lethal Ward.  While this probably isn't reason enough to play Irresistible Prize on its own, anyone playing Prize should consider these options to add additional utility.

Alternate Path: Centre of Attention

The most obvious alternative to Irresistible Prize is Centre of Attention.  The cards share a lot in common: the ability to draw models together, the same range and distance pushed, and the necessity of a "focal point" to move all affected targets toward.  The differences between the two cards are subtle, but may prove important in certain situations.

First, Centre of Attention is likely to have more potential targets for its "focus" than Prize.  You'll only ever have 5 (perhaps fewer) objective tokens on the board, while it's quite likely that there will be more than 5 models on the board at any given time.  That said, in particularly violent matches or those between low model-count warbands, Prize may actually have more targets - as objective tokens are significantly harder to remove than fighters.

Centre of Attention also grants you the ability to improvise where you are pushing fighters by moving the initial focus target.  This can prove advantageous if your opponent does something unexpected.  While Prize requires more pre-planning, it does allow you to start your focus at a place of your choosing in your opponent's territory, something that Centre can't do.

Finally, Prize can potentially push one more model (though this is not likely to ever be relevant) and can push models onto the focus hex - something Centre can't do because that hex would necessarily be occupied.  In the end, the cards are very similar, and anyone playing one would be well served to consider playing the other as well.


Irresistible Prize provides what all good ploys should provide - versatility.  It can group your units (Gitz), provide support for defensive decks (Stormcast), push models away from yours (defensive), pull models closer to yours (vs. defensive) and set up objective scores (hold-objective).  Additionally, it can set up a few devastating - if hard to achieve - combos that can result in several models taking lots of damage without the opportunity to defend themselves.  Gitz should obviously consider it as a way to set up Scurry, and other warbands seeking to create space or utilize area-damage spells should also think about adding it to their decks.


Popular posts from this blog

Special: Vassal

Decision: Should You Play Shadespire on Vassal? TL; DR: Yeah, it's pretty good - especially if you're in North America. Prologue Prior to picking up Shadespire, I played Legend of the Five Rings (the AEG version) for 20 years.  When FFG bought the game and rebooted it, I gave it a fair shake, and then decided to part ways with my oldest hobby.  A month before Gencon 2018, I decided to play Shadespire instead of L5R, and haven't put it down since. When I was playing L5R regularly, my playgroup traveled several times a year to play in large regional tournaments.  I had assumed this would be the case with Shadespire as well, but as most North American players can attest to - tournaments are pretty scarce in these parts.  (Whereas in England, you can't swing a soggy umbrella without hitting a Shadespire tournament). So, to keep up skill for the few tournaments I can attend ( SCO is next!), I started looking for ways to play online.  Luckily, a few wee

Special: The WurmStat

Special: The WurmStat TL;DR: Don't count on the damage reduction saving your "tail" very often - but it is a nice bonus that adds to the already solid survivability of the Trichinosis Team. A Mistake and A Warning Oops, wrong button. In our last article , we mentioned that there might be some times when it's beneficial to put Substance Siphon on Fecula, even if it didn't increase the number of dice that she's rolling on defense.  We arrived at that conclusion by doing a few specific calculations on attacks and defenses and factoring in the damage reduction ability of the Wurmstat.  In these specific cases, there were very slight improvements to the average damage Fecula would take against those attacks.  Upon realizing this, we got very excited to see how much benefit Fecula (and the other Barfbois) would gain from switching to dodges against all attacks .  So we did a prodigious amount of math. As it turns out, switching from blocks to

Cardiology: Double Feature! Branching Fate/One Fate

Decision: Should You Play Branching Fate/One Fate? TL;DR: Do you stride far? Then you should probably be playing Branching Fate.  Other warbands with high dice counts should consider playing Branching as well.  If you can manage to regularly roll 3 magic dice on spell attacks, One Fate is quite good.  Otherwise, pass on it. Prelude:Double Feature! This week we're taking a look at two different cards for Cardiology; rest assured this departure from standard operating procedure is for good reason.  Namely, the math required to analyze One Fate is very similar to the math required to analyze Branching Fate.  We couldn't see a reason to stretch the same work into two articles, so this week you're getting a two-for-one special. Factor: Warband In order to score either of the Fate objectives, you've got to be rolling three or more dice on attack or defense.  Rolling three dice on attack is pretty common (defense - less so), but some warbands definitely co