Skip to main content

Cardiology: Coordinated Attack

Decision - Should You Play Coordinated Attack?

TL; DR: 

Gitz and Chainrasps should definitely consider it.  Guard and Skaven might pick it up, and the other warbands should probably pass.

Factor: Warband

Obviously, Coordinated Attack favors those warbands with a lot of models over those with just a few.  None of the Sigmarite warbands are likely to benefit very much from playing Coordinated, and the benefit for Orks, Dwarves, or Fiends would be pretty limited.  Eyes of the Nine should also probably steer clear, as swarming around an opponent isn't really their style. 

The two 5-model warbands can both benefit from Coordinated Attack, but Skritch's fuzzy friends probably reap more reward from it than Garrek's Reavers.  Unfortunately for the Reavers the kill-and-die indiscriminately playstyle rewarded by their inspiration condition doesn't mesh well with this particular upgrade.  Skaven, on the other hand, can almost always generate a few supporters to back up whoever has Coordinated Attack, and the three scrub models gain a significant improvement from the attack itself.

The 7-model warbands benefit even more from Coordinated Attack, thanks to the mobility actions of their leaders; that's right, Varclav is the real leader.  Petitioners and Chainrasps alike can get an upgrade to either accuracy or damage (and to both, in at least one case) from the base attack, though The Ever-Hanged and the three named skeleton minions won't.  As we'll see shortly, however, the real power of this upgrade comes from the better-than-linear enhancement it receives from supporting units.

Finally, the Gitz are probably the best warband to take advantage of Coordinated Attack.  Not only do they have a plethora of models on the field to surround their enemies with, Scurry allows them to move several supporters into position at once and attack in a single activation.  Melee heavier models like Drizgit and Zarbag probably won't equip this upgrade (and the squigs can't), but Prog and the three archers all benefit from Coordinated Attack's increased damage versus their base attacks.

Factor: Compounding Accuracy

The real power of Coordinated Attack comes with the way that it scales with supporting models.  Let's take a look at a couple of examples.

At base, Coordinated Attack does 1.11 damage per unblocked use.  However, 2-swords to hit isn't great, and that damage output drops significantly when we include defenses.  Against a 1-shield defense, the attack action from this upgrade will only do an average of 0.8 damage per use at base.  Against 2-dodge defenses (an increasingly common defense stat with the release of Nightvault), this number drops to 0.70 per use, and against 2-shields it sinks to a miserable 0.6 damage per use.

However, when we start adding supporting units to the equation, we start to see a significant uptick in usefulness.  With 1 unit providing support (assuming none for the defender), we see an increase to 1.4 damage per use against 1-shield defenses, 1.22 damage per use against 2-dodge defenses, and 1.08 per use against 2-shield defenses.  These numbers increase further (to 1.76, 1.6, and 1.52, respectively) when we add a second supporter.

The compounding effect of Coordinated Attack generally ends there, but it continues to increase in accuracy and average damage output per use with each supporting fighter beyond the 2nd, although at a reduced rate of marginal gain.  Even if the marginal gain is relatively small, there is definitely something to be said for hucking 7 dice, all of which succeed 66% of the time, at your opponent's model once you have them completely surrounded.

In situations where your opponent also has supporters, these benefits still accrue, although the curve gets pushed to the right.  Initial supporters on your side will provide extra dice only, and the compounding effect won't begin until you outnumber the bad guys.  Nonetheless, this provides an accuracy bonus that large warbands can take advantage of even in situations where they wouldn't normally gain any benefit from supporting fighters.

Factor: Adjunct Cards

A less obvious benefit to using Coordinated Attack is that it enables some commonly used (and quite a few less-commonly used) cards, making them either easier to use or more effective.  Trap and Pit Trap, for example become very reliable off a 2-supporter attack with Coordinated Attack - as a hit or a tie is likely in over 80% of cases against all but the strongest of base defense stats. 

In terms of Objectives, Coordinated Attack really shines in enabling those objectives that require you to hit with a certain number of attacks in a round, such as Drag them Down or Let the Blood Flow.  Obviously, with a sufficient number of supporting fighters, you're likely to hit with Coordinated Attack, moving you partially toward that goal.  Less obviously, setting up a high-accuracy situation for your fighter with Coordinated Attack will also likely lead to a situation where your other models are also benefiting from support against the same target; an ideal situation for firing off several successful attacks.

Similarly, Coordinated Attack is great at getting Unstoppable to score, if you manage to catch an enemy model while they are on guard. 

Alternate Path: Mutating Maul

With the Awakened Weapon and Helpful Whispers relegated to the restricted list, accuracy enhancing upgrades became much harder to come by (the main exception being Potion of Rage, but it's really more of a ploy that you have to pay for).  Mutating Maul provides an accuracy boost against models with a shield-based defense, while still providing a benefit - if a small one - against dodge-based models as well in the form of knockback 1. Since both attacks do 2 damage and have a range of one hex, they are fairly easy to compare.

How does Mutating Maul stack up to Coordinated Attack?  That depends on who you're trying to murder.  Against dodge-based models, Mutating Maul will hit at-base about 12-15% more often, depending on the number of defense dice.  However once supporters start showing up, Coordinated Attack begins to gain significant amounts of accuracy over Mutating Maul.  With just a single supporter, Coordinated Attack becomes more accurate against all dodge based defenses than Maul by an average of 3%.  With two supporters, that number increases to 8-17% depending on how many dice your opponent is rolling to defend.  After two supporters, Coordinated Attack will continue to improve, while Mutated Maul will stagnate, furthering the gap between the two.

Against shield-based defenses, Mutating Maul starts off the comparison even better, hitting just over 25% of the time more than Coordinated Attack at-base.  Versus these more hardy defenders, Coordinated Attack will continue to lag behind by around 7% in accuracy even with one supporter.  However, with two or more supporters, Coordinated Attack becomes more accurate, even after factoring in cleave.

In the end, Coordinated Attack is going to give you a greater advantage than Mutating Maul any time you are able to conjure up at least 2 supporters (or 1 supporter against dodge-based armies).


As hinted at above, armies with large numbers of models are best suited to taking advantage of Coordinated Attack.  Chainrasps and Gitz probably get the most out of it, with Guard falling just slightly behind due to their sub-par movement mechanic.  Most other warbands can probably live without it, though Skaven may also wish to consider it.  Ultimately, Coordinated Attack provides what is potentially the most accurate attack in the game to those armies that can properly utilize it.


Popular posts from this blog

Special: Vassal

Decision: Should You Play Shadespire on Vassal? TL; DR: Yeah, it's pretty good - especially if you're in North America. Prologue Prior to picking up Shadespire, I played Legend of the Five Rings (the AEG version) for 20 years.  When FFG bought the game and rebooted it, I gave it a fair shake, and then decided to part ways with my oldest hobby.  A month before Gencon 2018, I decided to play Shadespire instead of L5R, and haven't put it down since. When I was playing L5R regularly, my playgroup traveled several times a year to play in large regional tournaments.  I had assumed this would be the case with Shadespire as well, but as most North American players can attest to - tournaments are pretty scarce in these parts.  (Whereas in England, you can't swing a soggy umbrella without hitting a Shadespire tournament). So, to keep up skill for the few tournaments I can attend ( SCO is next!), I started looking for ways to play online.  Luckily, a few wee

Hex and the City: Extreme Flank

Decision: How should I place my board to optimize Extreme Flank?   TL;DR:    This one for when you lose the rolloff or if you like your boards in the rectangular (non-offset) short board layout: Otherwise, this one: Prelude: Understanding Extreme Flank The first obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to properly set up for scoring Extreme Flank is to understand how the card actually works.  It's quite poorly worded and the resulting methods of scoring can be counter-intuitive.   Luckily, someone made this excellent little diagram to help us understand how to score it: In the above diagram, if your fighter is on a blue edge, they can only score Extreme Flank if your other fighter is on the green edge.  Note that the bottom layouts are mirrors of the top layouts.  This is important because the order in which you choose fighter matters .  For example, using the left diagrams, if you have a fighter on p4 and a fighter on p1 you can only score extreme flank if

Hex and the City: The Herbaceous Checkerboard

Decision: Should you play the New Board "The Herbaceous Checkerboard"?   TL;DR The warbands likely to get the most use out of this board are ones that have a small number of models and easy-to-score passive/defensive objectives; ie. the Sigmarite warbands.  Small aggro warbands like Orcs and Magore's may also benefit from using this board.  Other warbands likely have better options. Prelude Today, we'll be taking a look at one of the two new boards being released for Shadespire - The Herbaceous Checkerboard (the other board - the one with the blue - is called The Lachrymose Tetrahedron ).  For the purposes of referring to the board, we'll be using the above orientation as the default, and referring to specific edges and directions using a NESW system based on this orientation. Factor: Edge Hexes Right out of the box, we get to look at what is probably the most attractive feature of this board.  While having 4 starting-edge hexes is not partic