Skip to main content

Bottomdecking: Flickering Step

Decision: Should you play Flickering Step?


Author's Note: Bottomdecking is a new series of short articles where we examine bad choices that are made by reasonable people - please note that this is not meant as an indictment of any person, it's the cards that are bad, not the people.  Mostly, Bottomdecking articles are a fun way for me to cut my workload while I'm busy with real life stuff (Trauma Nursing Core Competencies, in this case), and hopefully cause a couple of people to chuckle along the way.

TL;DR: 

Nope.

Factor: The Odds

There are plenty of cards in Shadespire that allow us to push a friendly fighter 1 hex.  So, if we are choosing to play Flickering Step, we must assume that the purpose is to push more than one hex.  Unfortunately, the odds of that happening aren't great.  On eight dice, you are going to roll 2 or more criticals slightly less than 40% of the time.  In terms of reliability, that places Flickering only slightly better than Rebound, which has a much more powerful effect.  It should also be noted that approximately 23% of the time, Flickering Step will do absolutely nothing.  While cards that have failure chances are often worth playing, very few pack an underwhelming effect like this one. Playing Flickering Step is like playing Sidestep, but roughly one in every four times you play it a bully named Gerald rushes up to your table, flings your card across the room, kicks sand in your face, and walks away with your boyfriend.

"But Author!" I hear you say, "What if I roll 8 criticals and get to push all the way across the board so I can murder Vortemis before he summons a horror?!"  You won't.  The odds of rolling 8 criticals on 8 dice are roughly 1 in 1.6 million.  If, for example, you and your closest 99 friends decided to play Shadespire for 160 days straight, and each day every one of you played Flickering Step 100 times, there would still be a 37% chance that no one would roll 8 criticals on a single roll.

Put a different way, it costs approximately $350 to buy every warband in the game right now.  You could instead use that money to buy $6 worth tickets to the California state lottery every week for a year ($312) and have a significantly better chance of becoming a multi-millionaire than you would rolling 8 criticals on 8 dice for Flickering Step.

Or, you  could go place your $350 on a street bet (we like #10-12) on the local roulette wheel, win twice in a row (you're up $42k !), and then die from being struck by lightning.  That's still twice as likely as you pushing Gurzag 8 hexes with Flickering Step.

Really, the chance of rolling any number of successes over 5 is statistically insignificant - and you'll only roll 5 once in every 200 rolls; 87% of the time, you'll push 2 or fewer hexes.

Alternate Path: Pretty Much Anything, Really


So, the odds are against you - no big deal, you've always been a lucky sort!  Besides, push ploys are indisputably good; they set up attacks, move your models out of danger, and allow you to recapture objectives after you've been driven off them.   So why not play a better one?  Sidestep is the obvious choice here, as it always works and has no limitations on where it can go.  My Turn (so good it's restricted) allows you to push 1 and attack, given the right circumstances.  If you want to move more than 1, Countercharge, Mirror Move, and several warband-specific options allow for that in more limited settings.  Spectral Wings will boost your move by 2, matching or beating Flickering Step for distance covered in all but 13% of rolls.  Cards like Centre of Attention, Irresistible Prize, Earthquake, and Quick Advance even allow you to push multiple models.

But what if you're already playing all of those?  Surely Flickering Step could fit in as an additional push action?   No.  Try Hidden Paths.  Try Illusory Fighter.  Try Dancing With Death if you're that set on hating life.

Summary: 

Flickering Step is a bad card - don't @ me.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Special: The WurmStat

Special: The WurmStat TL;DR: Don't count on the damage reduction saving your "tail" very often - but it is a nice bonus that adds to the already solid survivability of the Trichinosis Team. A Mistake and A Warning Oops, wrong button. In our last article , we mentioned that there might be some times when it's beneficial to put Substance Siphon on Fecula, even if it didn't increase the number of dice that she's rolling on defense.  We arrived at that conclusion by doing a few specific calculations on attacks and defenses and factoring in the damage reduction ability of the Wurmstat.  In these specific cases, there were very slight improvements to the average damage Fecula would take against those attacks.  Upon realizing this, we got very excited to see how much benefit Fecula (and the other Barfbois) would gain from switching to dodges against all attacks .  So we did a prodigious amount of math. As it turns out, switching from blocks to

Cardiology: Larval Lance

Decision: Should You Play Larval Lance? TL;DR: Mollog should pass.  Rippa's should definitely be playing it.  As for the other bands, most aggro strategies will benefit from packing Larval Lance, especially in larger warbands.  Factor: The Basics With each new season of Shadespire, it seems that there is destined to be an attack upgrade that stands out among its peers.  Sometimes (as with Shadeglass Dagger), the acclaim is well warranted and the card goes on to become a staple in almost every deck.  Other times (looking at you, Fated Blade ), the hype is quite overblown, and the card disappears back into relative obscurity.  Six warbands into Season 3, the Belle of the Ball certainly seems to be Larval Lance.  But will it go on to win Prom Queen?  Or like Fated Blade, will it be consigned to standing near the exit, staring into a cup of unspiked punch, wondering if the cheeto stains on its cheap rented tuxedo are going to affect its deposit? On first glance, Larva

Cardiology: Double Feature! Branching Fate/One Fate

Decision: Should You Play Branching Fate/One Fate? TL;DR: Do you stride far? Then you should probably be playing Branching Fate.  Other warbands with high dice counts should consider playing Branching as well.  If you can manage to regularly roll 3 magic dice on spell attacks, One Fate is quite good.  Otherwise, pass on it. Prelude:Double Feature! This week we're taking a look at two different cards for Cardiology; rest assured this departure from standard operating procedure is for good reason.  Namely, the math required to analyze One Fate is very similar to the math required to analyze Branching Fate.  We couldn't see a reason to stretch the same work into two articles, so this week you're getting a two-for-one special. Factor: Warband In order to score either of the Fate objectives, you've got to be rolling three or more dice on attack or defense.  Rolling three dice on attack is pretty common (defense - less so), but some warbands definitely co