Skip to main content

Unpainted Minis: In Defense of Rebound

Unpainted Minis: In Defense of Rebound

To paraphrase the greatest rap story-song of 2015, "I'mma say something that you might hate to hear."  Rebound is good for the game.

We'll give you a minute to rage at your screen and curse our eyes.  Ok.  Now that we got that out of the way, let's talk about why.

The biggest reason Rebound is good for the game is that it provides a universally accessible reaction that punishes attacks.  In the brief period where it was banned this kind of reaction simply didn't exist.  This erases an entire aspect of the strategy of the game, as it eliminates any kind of risk for attacking.  This encourages braindead attacking on every turn, which doesn't make for an interesting game.

Rebound also provides a complementary benefit: a universally accessible reaction that can save your guy from imminent doom.    With the rotation of S1 universals, we lost not only Rebound but also Last Chance, Soultrap, and Tethered Spirit - leaving no way for you to escape the tyranny of overwhelming dice.  One of the most frustrating feelings when playing a game is to feel like you didn't get to play.  When your opponent throws down 4 ploys and an upgrade to get +6 dice on an attack and kill your most important model on the first turn, that's a real bad feeling (TM).  Full disclosure, we would have rather seen Last Chance come back than Rebound for this reason, but there really needs to be something to counter the strategy of pumping a single attack in order to lock out your opponent from the game.

Which really leads us to our next point - the superunit.  Rebound really saw a huge increase in play with the release of Mollog's Mob, and for good reason.  Mollog's entire strategy at release was to play as many ploys and upgrades as possible on Mollog and use a single model to devastate your opponent.  Unfortunately, warbands with a broader focus had a hard time competing with this, because Mollog could quickly become so powerful that the only good option was to run away.  Rebound helps to counter this strategy.

To quote Murs again, "Some men use arms cuz they ain't got hands."  The super-unit strategy becomes even more grating to play against when it can legitimately be used to make almost any model into a killing machine.  With the drastic increase in available passive early-game glory that came with S2, throwing 4-5 upgrades on a turd-rat and turning him into the king of the sewers became a highly viable strategy.  Nobody likes this.  Nobody.  Nope, not even that guy.

Essentially, Rebound punishes players for over-investing in a single attack or single unit.  This is a good thing.  In a game where destroying upgrades is almost impossible and there isn't (for good reason) any targeted unit-destruction, being able to turn your opponent's attack against them is the next best thing for dealing with super-units.  The more your opponent invests in a single attack, the worse it is for them to be Rebounded.  This encourages smart play.  And we all want to see that.

"The shooter is respected much less than the gladiator."  Well, maybe Murs, but getting picked apart by Ylthari, Stormdad, or a pack of roving methhead dwarves is no fun.   Season 1 warbands are especially vulnerable to this kind of tactic with their lack of ranged attacks and slower base movements.  As we discussed here, the main issue for season 1 warbands is lack of threat range.  Rebound helps them out by giving them a brief reprieve from the unending hail of season 2 ranged attacks.  Don't we all want S1 warbands to be more competitive?

That's not to say that Rebound isn't problematic in some senses, but the trouble with the card is often overblown.  First and foremost, this comes in the form of the hyperbolic statement that you can't win if a Rebound successfully goes off.   Yes, getting Rebounded sucks, but no it doesn't turn around blowout games.  If you've lost a game to a single card (Rebound, Distraction, Ready for Action, etc), that was a close game, and you got outplayed.  Games that aren't already close don't get turned on the corner of a single action or card; overwhelming victories come as the sum of many small decisions, cards, dice rolls, and strategies.  (We'll give Mollog a pass here - Rebound can completely ruin a Mollog player's overwhelming victory.  But they're playing Mollog, so does anyone really care?*)

Need proof?  Take a look at Ylthari's Guardians in late season 2.  Part of the reason that they succeeded in a highly combat-oriented meta was that none of their guys auto-one-shotted themselves if they got rebounded.  As long as you didn't pile on damage increases, a successful Rebound hurt, but it didn't kill.  (As the meta shifts with S3 to more Objective based, this became a less useful trait, but we predict Rippa's may see quite a bit of success partially due to the same reasons.)  In short, Ylthari's games didn't get turned around by Rebound, because their players didn't allow the game state to progress to a position where a single Rebound ruined their day.

You too, can perform this amazing feat!  Just don't pile a bunch of damage/accuracy bonuses on the same guy and hope to swing the whole game with one attack.

A lot of the salt that gets sprinkled around in competitive games comes from the idea that certain people (usually, "me") deserve to win and certain people don't (usually, "anyone I'm playing") based on something other than the actual progress of the game.  This can be seen in arguments against large top-cuts , arguments against concession rules, arguments about "lucky draws/dice," and arguments against Rebound.  If you're about to make an argument that someone didn't "deserve" to win, even if Rebound played a part in them winning, just walk yourself over to the garbage and rejoin your people in the bin.

On a final note, to reemphasize the genius of Okey Dog - and the necessity of cards like Rebound - let's take one more quote from Murs: 
 Square up, win some, lose some, might even save the day like John Witherspoon, son.
You're gonna lose some games.  You're gonna lose some games where Rebound plays a part.  It doesn't mean Rebound is bad for the game.  Losing is part of playing.  And in case you're about to overheat your keyboard typing out all your incisive responses to the above points and why Rebound should be banned, please remember:

We're all people, and being kind matters more than cardboard and plastic.


It only works a third of the time.

It only works a third of the time!




*We're kidding! We love Mollog players - just not Mollog.  Hate the sin, love the sinner and all that.


Popular posts from this blog

Special: Vassal

Decision: Should You Play Shadespire on Vassal? TL; DR: Yeah, it's pretty good - especially if you're in North America. Prologue Prior to picking up Shadespire, I played Legend of the Five Rings (the AEG version) for 20 years.  When FFG bought the game and rebooted it, I gave it a fair shake, and then decided to part ways with my oldest hobby.  A month before Gencon 2018, I decided to play Shadespire instead of L5R, and haven't put it down since. When I was playing L5R regularly, my playgroup traveled several times a year to play in large regional tournaments.  I had assumed this would be the case with Shadespire as well, but as most North American players can attest to - tournaments are pretty scarce in these parts.  (Whereas in England, you can't swing a soggy umbrella without hitting a Shadespire tournament). So, to keep up skill for the few tournaments I can attend ( SCO is next!), I started looking for ways to play online.  Luckily, a few wee

Hex and the City: Extreme Flank

Decision: How should I place my board to optimize Extreme Flank?   TL;DR:    This one for when you lose the rolloff or if you like your boards in the rectangular (non-offset) short board layout: Otherwise, this one: Prelude: Understanding Extreme Flank The first obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to properly set up for scoring Extreme Flank is to understand how the card actually works.  It's quite poorly worded and the resulting methods of scoring can be counter-intuitive.   Luckily, someone made this excellent little diagram to help us understand how to score it: In the above diagram, if your fighter is on a blue edge, they can only score Extreme Flank if your other fighter is on the green edge.  Note that the bottom layouts are mirrors of the top layouts.  This is important because the order in which you choose fighter matters .  For example, using the left diagrams, if you have a fighter on p4 and a fighter on p1 you can only score extreme flank if

Hex and the City: The Herbaceous Checkerboard

Decision: Should you play the New Board "The Herbaceous Checkerboard"?   TL;DR The warbands likely to get the most use out of this board are ones that have a small number of models and easy-to-score passive/defensive objectives; ie. the Sigmarite warbands.  Small aggro warbands like Orcs and Magore's may also benefit from using this board.  Other warbands likely have better options. Prelude Today, we'll be taking a look at one of the two new boards being released for Shadespire - The Herbaceous Checkerboard (the other board - the one with the blue - is called The Lachrymose Tetrahedron ).  For the purposes of referring to the board, we'll be using the above orientation as the default, and referring to specific edges and directions using a NESW system based on this orientation. Factor: Edge Hexes Right out of the box, we get to look at what is probably the most attractive feature of this board.  While having 4 starting-edge hexes is not partic