Skip to main content

Bottomdecking: Seize the Initiative

Decision: Should you play Seize the Initiative?

 Author's Note: Bottomdecking is a new series of short articles where we examine bad choices that are made by reasonable people - please note that this is not meant as an indictment of any person, it's the cards that are bad, not the people.  Mostly, Bottomdecking articles are a fun way for me to cut my workload while I'm busy with real life stuff (Getting ready for LVO, in this case), and hopefully cause a couple of people to chuckle along the way.

TL; DR: 

No; unless you play a 3-model warband, in which case: still no.

Factor: Probability

At base, you've got about a 1.6% chance of rolling 3 crits on any given rolloff for the first activation.  If you happen to place all your models first at the game's beginning, you've got a 13.2% chance of pulling three crits there - still not great.  However, we should also keep in mind that during that first activation rolloff, you've got the lowest chance of having Seize in hand (50% maximum, if you mulligan hard for it). 

Overall, in the course of a typical game, you've got a 4.8% chance to roll 3 crits (that's fewer than 1 in 20 games) during one of the "initiative" rolloffs, or 16.4% chance if you were the first to place all your models. Obviously, low model-count armies are more likely to get Seize to trigger because of this.

Seize the Initiative, however, isn't content with being only as reliable as the 1978 gremlin that your great uncle's weed dealer Buster drives around Cleveland.  Instead of simply needing to roll 3 crits on 4 dice, you also have to win the roll.  Now, that little caveat isn't a deal breaker, as your opponent is unlikely to beat you if you do manage to make the necessary rolls.  However, needing to win the roll does decrease your chance of meeting Seize's requirements by about 3 tenths of a percent on each roll.  Over the course of the game, that's going to mean you're capping out at about a 3.8% (or 15.4% if you finish placing first) chance of scoring Seize.

Factor: The Helium Problem

Generally, when we look at objectives, we look at adjunct cards that help you score that objective.  Unfortunately, there simply aren't any cards that enable Seize the Initiative.  You're entirely restricted to counting on lucky dice rolls to score it.  Literally the only thing you can do to make this card easier to score is to play a small warband and hope to finish placing your models first. 

Like Helium, Seize just doesn't go with anything.  Also like Helium, the only government approved use of Seize is to stuff it in a balloon and let it go so that it can later choke a pigeon.  Finally, if you insist on playing with Seize it will (just like Helium) make you sound like Mickey Mouse's 4 year old niece discovering puppies for the first time.  When you try to justify playing Seize the Initiative to your local playgroup, just remember that you will sound like an excited toddler desperately trying to recount a particularly complicated episode of Doc McStuffins to a bunch of trauma physicians.

Alternate Path: Aggressive Commander


If you absolutely must play an objective based on winning the initiative rolloffs, you might consider Aggressive Commander instead.  It's bad too, but not quite as bad.  After all, you're 50% likely to win any given rolloff, meaning that even without the bonus from placing all your models first, you'll go first all three rounds in about 12.5% of your games.  If you play a smaller warband, you're even more likely to be able to score Aggressive.  However, playing Aggressive Commander is kind of like choosing heroin over meth - it's still a really bad idea, but it won't rot your teeth, you bucket of spare parts.

Summary:


I mean it.

Comments

  1. the fact I had to even scroll to get to the end shows just how much commitment you have towards this game. I'd have put the article as : No, Just No! Move along now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please, tell me more about "Peerless Fighter"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peerless fighter is probably bad (I haven't done any math on it), but at least it doesn't suffer from the Helium Problem above. Potion of rage and Haymaker make it much more likely to go off. And Power Surge on Stormdaddy or Vortemis' base attack could actually make it relatively reliable.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Special: Vassal

Decision: Should You Play Shadespire on Vassal? TL; DR: Yeah, it's pretty good - especially if you're in North America. Prologue Prior to picking up Shadespire, I played Legend of the Five Rings (the AEG version) for 20 years.  When FFG bought the game and rebooted it, I gave it a fair shake, and then decided to part ways with my oldest hobby.  A month before Gencon 2018, I decided to play Shadespire instead of L5R, and haven't put it down since. When I was playing L5R regularly, my playgroup traveled several times a year to play in large regional tournaments.  I had assumed this would be the case with Shadespire as well, but as most North American players can attest to - tournaments are pretty scarce in these parts.  (Whereas in England, you can't swing a soggy umbrella without hitting a Shadespire tournament). So, to keep up skill for the few tournaments I can attend ( SCO is next!), I started looking for ways to play online.  Luckily, a few wee

Hex and the City: Extreme Flank

Decision: How should I place my board to optimize Extreme Flank?   TL;DR:    This one for when you lose the rolloff or if you like your boards in the rectangular (non-offset) short board layout: Otherwise, this one: Prelude: Understanding Extreme Flank The first obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to properly set up for scoring Extreme Flank is to understand how the card actually works.  It's quite poorly worded and the resulting methods of scoring can be counter-intuitive.   Luckily, someone made this excellent little diagram to help us understand how to score it: In the above diagram, if your fighter is on a blue edge, they can only score Extreme Flank if your other fighter is on the green edge.  Note that the bottom layouts are mirrors of the top layouts.  This is important because the order in which you choose fighter matters .  For example, using the left diagrams, if you have a fighter on p4 and a fighter on p1 you can only score extreme flank if

Hex and the City: The Herbaceous Checkerboard

Decision: Should you play the New Board "The Herbaceous Checkerboard"?   TL;DR The warbands likely to get the most use out of this board are ones that have a small number of models and easy-to-score passive/defensive objectives; ie. the Sigmarite warbands.  Small aggro warbands like Orcs and Magore's may also benefit from using this board.  Other warbands likely have better options. Prelude Today, we'll be taking a look at one of the two new boards being released for Shadespire - The Herbaceous Checkerboard (the other board - the one with the blue - is called The Lachrymose Tetrahedron ).  For the purposes of referring to the board, we'll be using the above orientation as the default, and referring to specific edges and directions using a NESW system based on this orientation. Factor: Edge Hexes Right out of the box, we get to look at what is probably the most attractive feature of this board.  While having 4 starting-edge hexes is not partic