Skip to main content

Cardiology: Distraction

Decision: Should You Play Distraction?



Almost Certainly.

Factor: Opening and Closing Distance

Perhaps the most obvious use of Distraction is to open or close distance between models.  Simply put, Distraction effectively increases the range of one of your attacks by 1, or decreases the range of your opponents' attack by one.  As we will find in many cases throughout this article, this effectiveness of Distraction here correlates directly with the skill of the player playing it; this effective change to range can be utilized either as a 1-time effect to set up a single attack or as a multiple use effect.  For example, if you use Distraction to push a model into charge range, you get to make one attack against that model that you wouldn't have been able to make normally.  However, if you use Distraction to push a model adjacent to one of yours, you may get to make several attacks that you normally would not have been able to make.  If we compare Distraction to, for example, Commanding Reach, we'll find that Distraction is the better card in almost every way. 

Similarly, using Distraction in different ways may result in avoiding a single attack or many.  Again, when compared to a card like Darkness Descends - which has the potential to save you from a single attack - Distraction handily comes out on top in almost all situations.

Distraction's effect is simple, and to an extent it may feel small.  However, it's important to remember the range of the card's usefulness expands with experience and play skill.  The better you get at Shadespire, the better Distraction will feel to you.

Finally, it's worth noting for this particular use of Distraction that warbands with lower movement scores benefit more from Distraction than faster warbands.  This is simply because Distraction's push represents a greater change in relative board state for slower warbands than faster ones.  For example, Distraction represents a 33% increase in effective charge range for a petitioner (3 to 4), while it represents only a 14% gain for Skritch (7 to 8).

Factor: Lethal Hexes

If you (or your opponent) are fond of using boards that have lethal hexes, you gain additional utility from Distraction, as you can use it to push models into them.  In the example board above, you can use Distraction to push any one of the dopey dwarves into the fire.  This board represents what is probably the highest degree of utility for this strategy, as the 16 "dopey" hexes make up 42% of the total occupiable hexes on the board!

The other lethal-hex boards represent less utility gain on this front for Distraction players, but still provide options for pushing models from dopey hexes into lethal hexes, as follows:

9 dopey hexes: 25%

10 dopey hexes: 28%

12 dopey hexes:  31%

One last thing: don't plan to use this strategy against the Thorns of the Briar Queen, you cup of baby carrots; you'll get laughed at.

Factor: Objective Disruption

With the recent rise of "mid-range" decks that tend to play passively in the early stages of the game then come out swinging with highly upgraded models later on, early game objective disruption is more important than ever.  Many of the passive objectives used by these kinds of decks are positional, and can be disrupted with Distraction.

Some of the most obvious choices for this kind of disruption are power objectives like Supremacy and Extreme Flank, but there are many other objectives that can be disrupted with Distraction.  There are so many, in fact, that it's easier to provide a picture than a list.  So, courtesy of Underworld's Deckers, here's a picture, and a link!

For those of you who are curious, that's 32 objectives that are easily and clearly (no intricate machinations required) disrupted by Distraction - representing just shy of one quarter of all the universal objectives!

Factor: Adjuncts

In addition to disrupting your opponent's game plan, Distraction can also be used to set up a few objective scores of your own.  Denial and Contained immediately spring to mind, as they are heavy hitting 3-glory scores in the 3rd end phase.  However, just like with the disruption strategy, there are a lot of objectives that get a boost from Distraction.  Once again, I've included a link and picture rather than attempting to list them all:

Please note that, contrary to prior policy, I've included cards like Ploymaster and Master of War here.  Normally, I don't consider these cards to form "combos" with most ploys, because literally any ploy will work (Spoils of Battle and Master of War being an exception).  However, I'm including them in this case because Distraction is so easy to play, that you'll never end up holding on to it if you don't want to.  Unless you've killed literally every enemy model - in which case you're probably not worried about scoring Ploymaster - you always have a target for Distraction.  In total, the above objectives represent 17% of all of the available universal objectives (23/132).

Alternate Path: Sidestep

Comparison of Sidestep and Distraction is damn near impossible.  They're both so versatile and flexible that there are nearly infinite situations in which they could each be used.  However, for simplicity sake, we can examine the above mentioned factors to some extent.  For starters, Sidestep will open and close distance in essentially the same manner as Distraction, so we can call them equal there.  Sidestep can't be used to push enemy models into lethal hexes, but it can be used to bail your model out of dopey hexes, so it's probably a wash there too.  As for adjuncts and disruption, we could essentially switch the two lists and maintain a fair degree of accuracy; Sidestep is less useful for disruption, but more useful for helping you score your own objectives.

In the end, it's that last factor that should determine which you play.  If you're more concerned with scoring points (Goblins) or moving your own models into specific places (Farstriders/Dwarves), you should probably play Sidestep.  If you are more concerned with preventing your opponent from scoring (Defensive Sigmar) or pinging damage (Cursebreaker Spellswarm), you should play Distraction.  But honestly, you should probably play both.


Distraction is a fantastically flexible card that can fit into literally any deck.  While it may, at first, appear as filler for this reason, we don't think it's an exaggeration to say that you really should be comparing literally every other ploy you choose to it; when you select a ploy for your deck, ask yourself :"Is this ploy really more useful to me than Distraction?"  We think you'll find that most of you will end up answering that question with a "no" at least once in your decks.


  1. Should you play 2 distractions though? (Universal and fraction one for warbands that have it)

  2. I think again, the question to ask is: Will X card serve me better than Distraction? If you can answer no for 2 of your cards, play 2x Distraction. =)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Special: Vassal

Decision: Should You Play Shadespire on Vassal? TL; DR: Yeah, it's pretty good - especially if you're in North America. Prologue Prior to picking up Shadespire, I played Legend of the Five Rings (the AEG version) for 20 years.  When FFG bought the game and rebooted it, I gave it a fair shake, and then decided to part ways with my oldest hobby.  A month before Gencon 2018, I decided to play Shadespire instead of L5R, and haven't put it down since. When I was playing L5R regularly, my playgroup traveled several times a year to play in large regional tournaments.  I had assumed this would be the case with Shadespire as well, but as most North American players can attest to - tournaments are pretty scarce in these parts.  (Whereas in England, you can't swing a soggy umbrella without hitting a Shadespire tournament). So, to keep up skill for the few tournaments I can attend ( SCO is next!), I started looking for ways to play online.  Luckily, a few wee

Hex and the City: Extreme Flank

Decision: How should I place my board to optimize Extreme Flank?   TL;DR:    This one for when you lose the rolloff or if you like your boards in the rectangular (non-offset) short board layout: Otherwise, this one: Prelude: Understanding Extreme Flank The first obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to properly set up for scoring Extreme Flank is to understand how the card actually works.  It's quite poorly worded and the resulting methods of scoring can be counter-intuitive.   Luckily, someone made this excellent little diagram to help us understand how to score it: In the above diagram, if your fighter is on a blue edge, they can only score Extreme Flank if your other fighter is on the green edge.  Note that the bottom layouts are mirrors of the top layouts.  This is important because the order in which you choose fighter matters .  For example, using the left diagrams, if you have a fighter on p4 and a fighter on p1 you can only score extreme flank if

Hex and the City: The Herbaceous Checkerboard

Decision: Should you play the New Board "The Herbaceous Checkerboard"?   TL;DR The warbands likely to get the most use out of this board are ones that have a small number of models and easy-to-score passive/defensive objectives; ie. the Sigmarite warbands.  Small aggro warbands like Orcs and Magore's may also benefit from using this board.  Other warbands likely have better options. Prelude Today, we'll be taking a look at one of the two new boards being released for Shadespire - The Herbaceous Checkerboard (the other board - the one with the blue - is called The Lachrymose Tetrahedron ).  For the purposes of referring to the board, we'll be using the above orientation as the default, and referring to specific edges and directions using a NESW system based on this orientation. Factor: Edge Hexes Right out of the box, we get to look at what is probably the most attractive feature of this board.  While having 4 starting-edge hexes is not partic