Skip to main content

Cardiology: Glory Multipliers

Decision: Should You Play Glory Multipliers?


For most decks, no.  For some, highly specific decks (Keys, Tomes, Relics, and other such shenanigans), they might be beneficial, particularly if you're the big fish in a small pond.


This week we're going to do things a little differently, in that we're looking at two cards for Cardiology.  Solid Gains and Great Gains can both be called "Glory Multipliers" because they both essentially do the same thing - reward you for gaining a certain amount of glory during a round.  Since the mechanics of scoring either card are the same, it's easy enough to examine them both at the same time; they differ only in magnitude.

Factor: Investment vs. Return

Compared to almost any other objective, the requirements on the Glory Multipliers are simple to achieve - gain X glory in any way.  However, we need to consider how well the reward matches the effort of these cards.  For example, killing 3 enemy  models would give you 3 glory, but if you did that, you could also score Butchery or Devastation, which would reward you with more glory than Solid Gains.  You could also score 3 glory by successfully scoring 3 other objectives - in which case you could score Victory after Victory instead of Solid Gains and get twice the glory. 

The Glory Multipliers' value, however, lies in their flexibility.  You can score them by gaining sufficient glory in any way.  This allows you not only to score a combination of kills and other objectives, but to make use of methods not covered by other objectives.  Below is a (probably not complete) list of universal options you could use to gather that all important 3/5 glory that aren't covered by one of the alternatives mentioned in the previous paragraph:
  • Katophrane Relics' 6-card ability
  • Tome of Glories
  • Tome of Offerings 
  • Crown of Avarice
  • A Destiny to Meet
  • Keys
  • Apex Predator
  • Hero's Mantle
  • Treacherous Second
  • Shifting Map
  • Slumbering Key
  • Anticipation
  • Daylight Robbery
  • Sacrificial Pawn
  • Scavenge
Between the two Glory Multipliers discussed here, Solid Gains is obviously easier to score.  Great Gains rewards you with twice the glory, but at the cost of being significantly harder to score.  The increase granted by each, relative to the glory scored in the round, can be seen below.  In an ideal world, of course, you'd play Great Gains, because you would be scoring just oodles of points every round and it would never be dead in your hand.  In reality, however, the utility of either of the Glory Multipliers is directly related to your ability to score multiple glory in the same phase.  Choose your poison accordingly.

Factor: Ease of Scoring

While Glory Multipliers seem easy to score, let's take a look at the most recent Grand Clash (UKGE) to see just how often they would have been useful.  If we examine the top 6 matches of the last round at UKGE - ostensibly where the best players playing the best decks were - we see that on average, any given player scored 12.83 glory in an average game.  This means that in an average game, on an average turn, the average undefeated player at UKGE could not score Great Gains.  Conversely, the average undefeated player in an average turn of an average game in the 4th round could score Solid Gains. 

Of course, averages don't tell the whole story.  Of the 12 players covered in this analysis, some did much better than others.  In an average turn, 5 of the 12 players could have scored Great Gains, as they averaged more than 15 points per game.  On the other side of the coin, 3 of the 12 players could not have even scored Solid Gains on an average turn, as they were putting out fewer than 9 points per game.  All of the players who scored 15+ points per game won their games - all of the players who scored fewer than 9 lost theirs.  Which leads us to our next point...

Factor: "Win More" Cards

One criticism that is often leveled at Glory Multiplier cards is that they are "Win More" cards; cards that function best when you are already in a significantly stronger position than your opponent.  The numbers we examined above in the final round of UKGE certainly seem to support this criticism.  This is particularly telling when we consider that some of the points accounted for in the above analysis no doubt came from objectives scored - at least one of which would have to be replaced to make room for a Glory Multiplier. 

For example, if you score Fired Up, Blooded, and Geared For War in the first end phase of your game, you have gained enough glory to also score Solid Gains - but you can't, because you don't have it in hand.  While this is likely an edge case for Solid Gains, the concern becomes quite real when we look at Great Gains.  Scoring 5 glory in a round can be quite difficult, particularly if you have to do it without the help of 1/3 of your objective hand.  And if you can score that 5 glory in the round and end the round with Great Gains in hand, you are probably already doing well enough that you don't really need Great Gains.

Simply put, these cards benefit players the most during lopsided games where one player is doing significantly better than the other.  Since the goal of competitive deckbuilding is to be able to "beat the field" and not "beat the kid who just started playing yesterday", Glory Multipliers may not be the best choice for most builds.


Glory Multipliers probably shouldn't be first line picks for most decks.  There are niche decks that can benefit greatly from them, particularly those decks that:
  • Score large amounts of glory in a single round (Keys, Tomes, Relics)
  • Don't run a lot of Score Immediately Objectives (those decks should run Victory after Victory and Combination Strike)
  • Don't need a lot of glory from their objectives in "off rounds"
  • Aren't overly dependent on objectives/kills for glory gain (they have better options)
If your deck fits that profile, try the Glory Multipliers out and see which one (if any) fits your scheme best.  We'd recommend starting with Solid Gains and working your way up to Great Gains if you find you're routinely overshooting the 3 glory mark for Solid.


Popular posts from this blog

Special: The WurmStat

Special: The WurmStat TL;DR:Don't count on the damage reduction saving your "tail" very often - but it is a nice bonus that adds to the already solid survivability of the Trichinosis Team.
A Mistake and A Warning Oops, wrong button.
In our last article, we mentioned that there might be some times when it's beneficial to put Substance Siphon on Fecula, even if it didn't increase the number of dice that she's rolling on defense.  We arrived at that conclusion by doing a few specific calculations on attacks and defenses and factoring in the damage reduction ability of the Wurmstat.  In these specific cases, there were very slight improvements to the average damage Fecula would take against those attacks.  Upon realizing this, we got very excited to see how much benefit Fecula (and the other Barfbois) would gain from switching to dodges against all attacks.  So we did a prodigious amount of math.
As it turns out, switching from blocks to dodges is a bad idea if you d…

Cardiology: Larval Lance

Decision: Should You Play Larval Lance? TL;DR: Mollog should pass.  Rippa's should definitely be playing it.  As for the other bands, most aggro strategies will benefit from packing Larval Lance, especially in larger warbands. 
Factor: The Basics With each new season of Shadespire, it seems that there is destined to be an attack upgrade that stands out among its peers.  Sometimes (as with Shadeglass Dagger), the acclaim is well warranted and the card goes on to become a staple in almost every deck.  Other times (looking at you, Fated Blade), the hype is quite overblown, and the card disappears back into relative obscurity.  Six warbands into Season 3, the Belle of the Ball certainly seems to be Larval Lance.  But will it go on to win Prom Queen?  Or like Fated Blade, will it be consigned to standing near the exit, staring into a cup of unspiked punch, wondering if the cheeto stains on its cheap rented tuxedo are going to affect its deposit?

On first glance, Larval Lance appears to…

Cardiology: Double Feature! Branching Fate/One Fate

Decision: Should You Play Branching Fate/One Fate? TL;DR: Do you stride far? Then you should probably be playing Branching Fate.  Other warbands with high dice counts should consider playing Branching as well.  If you can manage to regularly roll 3 magic dice on spell attacks, One Fate is quite good.  Otherwise, pass on it.
Prelude:Double Feature! This week we're taking a look at two different cards for Cardiology; rest assured this departure from standard operating procedure is for good reason.  Namely, the math required to analyze One Fate is very similar to the math required to analyze Branching Fate.  We couldn't see a reason to stretch the same work into two articles, so this week you're getting a two-for-one special.
Factor: Warband In order to score either of the Fate objectives, you've got to be rolling three or more dice on attack or defense.  Rolling three dice on attack is pretty common (defense - less so), but some warbands definitely come naturally better eq…